Thursday, December 13, 2018

PREVIEW: North Carolina A&T at East Tennessee State at 7 pm ET THURSDAY on ESPN+





PREVIEW ARTICLE

Game Notes: Arkansas State WBB vs MVSU @ 12:30 pm ET on THURSDAY

GAME NOTES   



THURSDAY ON ESPN+ @11:30 a.m: Howard WBB at Campbell








THURSDAY ON ESPN+ @ 11 AM ET: Kentucky State WBB at Wright State




Santa Clara Men's Basketball Faces Mississippi Valley State on Thursday

GAME PREVIEW ARTICLE


GAMEDAY INFORMATION

TicketsClick here
TVNone
VideoTheW.tv
Radio/AudioKDOW-AM 1220
Live StatsStatBroadcast
Game NotesSanta Clara | Mississippi Valley St.

THURSDAY'S PREVIEW: NCCU Eagles at McNeese State Cowboys




GAME PREVIEW

THURSDAY ON ESPN+@ 7 pm ET: Maryland Eastern Shore at Duquesne


THURSDAY ON BTN @ 8 pm ET: Savannah State at #16 Wisconsin



71st’s Micah Shaw goes from North Carolina A&T sub to AP 1st-team All-American in one season



READ STORY: 71st’s Shaw goes from sub to 1st-team All-American in one season

Aggies and Braves Have Arrived in the ATL for the 2018 Celebration Bowl





After UNC Walks, NCAA Puts The Screws To NCCU


NCAA appeals committee upholds decision to vacate North Carolina Central wins


NCAA Appeals Committee upholds vacation of North Carolina Central wins

INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana -- North Carolina Central must vacate football, baseball and men’s basketball records in which student-athletes competed while ineligible, according to a decision by the NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee.

In the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions’ decision, the panel found and the university agreed that North Carolina Central did not monitor its certification process when it improperly certified 22 student-athletes in a total of seven sports as eligible for competition.

Download the Dec. 2018 North Carolina Central Univ. Public Appeals Decision

In its appeal, the university argued the Committee on Infractions should not have prescribed the vacation of records for three reasons: The Committee on Infractions ignored directives from Division I membership to avoid disproportionate penalties on student-athletes; it ignored Level III case precedent involving the same or similar violations; and the competitive advantage rationale should not apply to the university’s situation because the violations were the result of clerical or technical errors, not an attempt to keep student-athletes eligible for competition.

In its response to the appeal, the Committee on Infractions noted that vacating records is a membership-approved penalty used in infractions cases involving ineligible competition to address the advantage a university gains by playing ineligible student-athletes.

In its decision, the Infractions Appeals Committee addressed the three issues the university raised. It noted the membership directive cited by the university applies specifically to the processes for waivers, amateurism certification and student-athlete reinstatement. The NCAA Division I Council did not intend for the directives to apply to the prescription of penalties in the infractions process when it adopted the directives.

The Infractions Appeals Committee also detailed that there are separate NCAA rules that govern Level II and Level III violations and penalties, as well as different groups that decide the cases. Since the university agreed that the violations were Level II, the Infractions Appeals Committee noted the university inherently agreed to the prescription of penalties under the guidelines and case precedent related to Level I and II violations. Because of that, the Committee on Infractions is not bound by Level III precedent when prescribing penalties in a Level II case.

Lastly, the Infractions Appeals Committee wrote that the underlying assumption of the university’s argument, that no competitive advantage was gained, is that any waiver or reinstatement requests would have been approved. Since the university did not actually submit waivers or reinstatement requests, the outcomes of the processes are not guaranteed and does not free the university from penalties.

The members of the Infractions Appeals Committee who heard this case were Ellen M. Ferris, associate commissioner for governance and compliance at the American Athletic Conference; W. Anthony Jenkins, attorney in private practice; Patti Ohlendorf, committee chair and special advisor in the office of legal affairs at Texas; Allison Rich, senior associate athletics director and senior woman administrator at Princeton; and David Shipley, law professor and faculty athletics representative at Georgia.

NCAA PUBLIC AND MEDIA RELATIONS

NCAA MBB National Championship Trophy Tour Stops at Grambling State University



Johnson's 16 points pushes Delta State WBB over LeMoyne-Owen 79-63


Second Half Comeback Falls Short for Albany State Rams




Alcorn State was the only real choice for quarterback Noah Johnson


Grambling State Christmas named AP FCS All-American



North Carolina Central Tops UNCG for First Win(Video Highlights)







CSU Athletics Hires Parker as Associate AD for Academic Services and SWA


Alabama State MBB falls to Boise State despite 17 from Ross




NSU Spartans Can’t Finish Comeback, Drop 81-71 Decision to Rider






CSU’s Matt Brown Named WAC Men’s Indoor Track Athlete of the Week



PVAMU Women's Basketball Drops Match to Colorado






Wisconsin Badgers cage Chicago State, 85-38



GAME RECAP